I had spent the previous twelve years interviewing religious leaders,
and I recognized Father Amphilochois as a promising interviewee: he
was firmly rooted in a primitive Christian faith which shaped his
every waking hour... Since he had experience as a missionary,
spreading the Christian message among the tribal people of West
Africa, it seemed fair to ask him about his techniques for
enlightening unbelievers. I was one of them, and I was tackling him on
behalf of liberal humanism.
I explained to him that I was a member of an enormous modern tribe
that rejected the Christian message. This was not because we knew too
little but because we knew too much. We understood the human psyche;
we had analysed the workings of the human mind, conscious and
unconscious... we knew that religious faith was simply a compensatory
mechanism that gave emotional reassurance to the insecure... We
sought the truth and, unlike Christians, saw no virtue in putting our
trust in so-called realities for which there was insufficient
evidence. For the past three hundred years leading intellectuals of
our tribe had examined the philosophical proofs for the existence of
God and found them wanting. Our scholars had looked at the linguistic
and archeological evidence for biblical truths and pronounced them
flawed. Our biologists accepted a version of the story of life on
earth that needed no external directing hand. So, we had abandoned
Christianity after long and careful consideration of its claims and
with much regret. That rejection was a consequence of our fearless
pursuit of truth. "If you came," I said, "as a missionary to my tribe
today, what would you say to us?" I sat back, conscious that I had put
him on the spot. He looked at me with a smile and said simply: "I
would not say anything to you. I would simply live with you. And I
would love you."
This was not the answer I expected from a theologian... When I heard
these words from that man at that time, I experienced a shift in
understanding. It was like the impact of great music. We all hear
important truths many times in our lives, but it is only when we are
ready for them that they penetrate... That morning a door opened. I
realized that to approach Christianity, as I had tried, from what
seemed to be the logical first step - that is, by examining the
arguments for the existence of God - was to tackle it from the wrong
end. The most basic principle of learning is to start with the known
and move to the unknown. I had been trying to start from the unkowable.
Father Amphilochios was proposing that the journey to Christian truth
should start with the human experience of life: it should move, that
is, from the known to the unknown.
- Peter France, A Place of Healing for the Soul: Patmos
Wednesday, December 12, 2012
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.