.... His interest in the divine was more instinctive than formal. He
loved miracles. For him, as for a medieval monk, they were everyday
possibilities. He was quite capable of embellishing perfectly mundane
conversations with the sudden memory of a saintly body, long buried,
which had been disinterred uncorrupted and with a fragrant smell. When
we were considering which Cavafy poems to use he rang in great
excitement to say that the volume had leapt off the shelf and fallen
open at the perfect choice.
The Greek sun, taken with some
retsina, was good for his spirit in moderate doses; and there was
something more generally about the Greek world that played into an
intensely emotional side of his thinking. The references didn’t have to
be to God — his Sappho Fragments of 1981 are among the most refined
things he wrote. He could have gone further with that style, but equally
enthralling to him was the mystical world of Greek (and Russian)
Orthodoxy, ultimately to him a mood, a kind of scented picture, from
which so much of his output flowed.
He said recently that the
image of him as a joyless old hermit, surrounded by candles, had been
imposed on him by the media. I’m not sure I entirely buy that either, as
anyone who has seen the exquisite chapel he created out of a stable at
his home may agree. But in the end this was his official look, which
only conveyed a small part of his character. It also tended to play down
his sheer technical ability as a musician: he was capable of writing
some of the most mathematically involved passages available to a
composer, known as canons, partly as a result of having studied the
music of the renaissance master Josquin des Prez. The last example of
this particular knack has yet to be heard. Just before he died he wrote a
Requiem (called Requiem Fragments) for me to conduct on some big
occasion next year, in order to help celebrate his 70th birthday, which
would have fallen on 28 January. Its last 20 pages or so consist of a
triple-choir canon, which on paper looks as complicated as these things
ever get. If I had been able to ask him how he had conceived this
incredible texture — as I did in a similar passage years ago in his Ikon
of Light — he would have replied that it just came out like that. It
was another miracle.
One of John’s leitmotifs was God as light.
He relished the way light could not be contained, as God’s benign spirit
cannot. When he was free to express some part of this conjunction he
could write masterpieces. Sometimes these were very long and sometimes
very short. We’ll hear them all during 2014 — an anniversary year all
the more poignant now — and I am certain none will be more affecting,
Mozart-like, than this Requiem.
Peter Phillips is director of the Tallis Scholars
http://www.spectator.co.uk/arts/music/9082101/remembering-my-friend-john-tavener/
Wednesday, November 27, 2013
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.